It's Almost Fully Operational ..
In the grand scheme of history, in the great wash of the collective American cosmos, in the midst of the day to day howls and earth rattles of towering financial and political giants, many of us tend to see ourselves as "the little people".
We consider ourselves inconsequential in the wake of epic events that appear to rise and fall like irregular tides and determined by some frenetic force of chance; a great cultural roulette wheel. In fact, we are often encouraged to emulate this belief. Better to roll with the river of difficult times than to fight against the current in a fruitless attempt at changing its direction.
Better to let more important and more powerful men blaze the trails that we will later follow, right...?
Human beings have a strange attachment to the concept of the "decision makers vs. the decision followers", even in the U.S. The Declaration of Independence was meant to herald the birth of a society which dissolved the separation between the rulers and those who are ruled.
Our country was built upon the premise that every citizen has a right to participate in the making of his own providence, to play a part in the decisions that directly or indirectly affect his future.
Of course, those were the days when average Americans saw themselves as giants, as innovators of history, not as little people.
Today, in the face of globalization, some American's see the evolution of a rulership class as natural and even necessary.
One of the most overwhelming aspects of the so called globalization (corporatization) of Western civilization has been the incredible amounts of lost time.
We are thrust into a 70% service based economy in which the average person feels little to no pride in their work and absolutely no fulfillment.
That same person then goes home at the end of the day to his digital cable T.V., which immerses him in visions of a happy-go-lucky planet, a fantasy realm that promises better days ahead but bears no resemblance to the world outside his living room.
Like 'Alice in Wonderland', he finds himself surrounded by confusion, hypocrisy, and misdirection.
A land of madmen and clowns.
All the "professionals" he is told to trust make claims that seem outrageously incongruent with reality.
Nothing is what it appears to be, and so, he stops questioning the illusion and pretends that the abracadabra of our elitist run America doesn't bother him.
He stops caring, and so, his time on this Earth loses its value.
For the past several decades, those of us who have been aware of the smoke and mirrors and refuse to ignore their effects have paid a dear price; the anguish of witnessing the deconstruction of our nation, as well as the infantization of our friends and family.
When I was very young, I had certain assumptions about the path to adulthood.
I believed that it was a transition that came as naturally to every person as walking or talking.
Surely, I thought, there simply came a time when a man crossed a biological threshold that made him more responsible, more principled, more intuitive, more courageous, more compassionate, more wise.
Now that I am much older, I find to my disappointment that wisdom does not necessarily come with age.
Some people choose to remain children forever.
In a society driven by a fabricated sense of affluence, Americans have lost the memory of what it was like to deliberately build their futures.
The concept of debt creation, mass credit movements, free money bonanzas, facilitated by the policies of the private Federal Reserve, made overgrown babies out of us all.
We came to demand a pre-constructed future, one in which we were entitled to whatever we wanted NOW, not later.
We never earned the engineered prosperity we have enjoyed since the baby-boom of the 1950's, and so we never learned to appreciate what true prosperity actually was; that it requires effort, and sometimes sacrifice.
We merely expected that this was the way things were supposed to be, and that they would never change...
Infantized people are driven by a desperate search for ways to offload the responsibilities they inherit when they are forced to set off on their own lives.
The idea of 'struggle' is abhorrent to them. As a result, they gravitate towards environments in which centralized authorities offer them the chance to simplify their existence in an ultimate sense.
Essentially, like the children that they are, they look for a government which is willing to assume the role of 'parent' or legal guardian.
They believe that out there, somewhere, a government system exists that is capable of cradling them in a blanket of pure safety and contentment from birth until death; a mother government.
They believe in a ruling class that loves them unconditionally.
Why else would they blindly leave their fates in the hands of global bankers who now run both major parties of our political dynamic, dominate the ebb and flow of our economy, and write domestic policy?
Why else would they ignore the signs of crisis that are ripping through the veil all around them?
They must trust the Elites complicitly.
Many of us, when we were children, could not wait to take charge of our own lives without the constant prying eyes and prattling of our elders.
Sometimes we forget that being a child can be carefree, but it also means doing what you are told.
So, what price will the perpetual children of our society have to pay to be included in the feudal nanny state lifestyle of what globalist bankers and aristocrats commonly call the "New World Order"?
Austerity In A Nanny State?
EU member countries such as Greece are facing this awkward juxtaposition of economic elements today, and as elitists push for progressively bigger government in the U.S., we will be confronted with the same conundrum here.
Austerity is basically the dissolution of national entitlement programs (welfare, social security, etc.) in an attempt to bridge gaps in budget shortfalls during financial crises and keep the government running.
However, when that same government is attempting to administrate and micro-manage every detail of the lives of its citizens, Austerity and fiscal responsibility are not ideal.
The fiat, as it were, must freely flow without question.
So, how will they solve this conflict?
By continuing entitlement programs that keep the public hooked on government handouts, but diminishing the value of those handouts across the board.
This is much like asking for a free lunch and being given a half-chewed sandwich.
That is to say, welfare stipends will continue but become so small as to do more harm than good.
The point of this is to acclimate the masses towards the idea of living on almost nothing while at the same time thanking the government for the opportunity to do so.
One could just as easily live on almost nothing WITHOUT government handouts and table scraps with strings attached, but infantized Americans, desperate for a "loving" authority figure to lead the way, are unlikely to awaken to this fact.
Trading Privacy For The Illusion Of Safety
No government will ever be able to offer a guarantee of safety to its people.
The more power officials are given to clamp down on citizens in the name of the "greater good", the more liable those officials are to abuse that power and become a danger to the public themselves.
Some might call this a paradox, but its not.
Often, governments driven by elitist influences create fear in the citizenry so that they might exploit it.
It is far preferable to fool an individual into asking you to take over his life, than it is to attempt to do so through brute force.
Infantized Americans always make the same statement when privacy rights are diminished; "If you have nothing to hide, then why does it matter if the government knows everything about you?"
Firstly, because we get nothing out of the trade.
Americans will not be safer under global centralization.
Bigger governments do not prevent crime, they only mop up the aftermath and chase off curious onlookers.
The only person that can be expected to provide for your personal safety is YOU.
This is the reality that pro-nanny state people do not want to hear. They are frightened to death at the prospect that only they can ensure their own future.
Most children are horrified at the idea of fending for themselves.
Secondly, no government has ever or will ever be honorable and forthright enough to assume the position of universal adjudicator.
In America, you are supposed to be innocent until proven guilty, but in a world of constant surveillance, the government assumes that everyone is guilty unless proven otherwise.
Surveillance creates a social atmosphere in which we must demonstrate our innocence everyday of our lives to some faceless official in a small room monitoring our every email, our every phone call, our every action.
In short, whether or not I have "something to hide" is not for a bloated bureaucracy to decide.
They will never be trustworthy enough to take on the task anyway.
Instead, I think our country would be far safer if those cameras were turned the other way, into the White House, Congressman's homes, etc.
Any full grown adult who is cowardly enough to demand that other people constantly keep watch over him to ensure he never has to protect himself deserves the fate he is dealt when his watchers take advantage of him.
Health And Government Indifference
Ask any veterans you know how they feel about going to their government run VA hospital.
The vast majority of them will shudder at the thought. Why? Because governments and elitists traditionally do not care about the well being of the citizenry, they only care about maintaining their positions of influence.
They are sociopathic, and sociopaths tend not to make great doctors.
Sure, corporate health care has many problems, but can a corporate hospital label you mentally unstable and take away your Second Amendment rights?
How often do corporate hospitals "accidentally" infect thousands of patients with HIV, hepatitis, or cancer?
How many purposely reuse unsanitary equipment or IV bags?
How many corporate hospitals then physically threaten reporters trying to get information on such activities?
All of this and more is commonplace in government run VA facilities.
And, if this is how our government treats Veterans who served with distinction, how do you think they will treat the rest of us?
We all hated the rich kid in high school whose daddy bought him every ridiculously extravagant item imaginable.
Some of us later grew up and realized that substantial wealth is pretty irrelevant compared to substantial personal character.
Others of us didn't grow up, and continued to hold a grudge.
The opportunity to become successful or wealthy is not the problem with America.
The problem is those men who abuse wealth as a way to create an unequal playing field in which they never have to fairly compete with anyone else.
America is not being destroyed by capitalist competitiveness.
It is being destroyed by a complete lack of competitiveness! Wealth harmonization is yet another method by which this top1% of the world's richest elites rig the game in their favor while fooling us into believing the system is more balanced.
Infantized Americans seem to think that asset redistribution is some magic math-blasting poverty buster. In fact, as efforts in the EU have revealed, harmonization does make everyone (except the top 1%) equal; it makes everyone equally poor.
Rich countries degrade and lose the capacity to nurture productive and thriving societies while poor countries are lifted up just enough to appear more profitable but still stand on the edge of dire straights. The middle class slowly disappears, replaced by an enormous destitute population looking across an endless wage gap at the ultra rich, who only seem to benefit further from the so called "harmony".
How often do children get a chance to "vote out" a parent that has abused their authority or committed great trespasses? Never. If infantized Americans are so keen on establishing a parent/child relationship with their government, the same rules will apply.
These men and women love to parrot the argument that "in our democratic society, the people ARE the government, and we can make any changes we want if something goes awry..
Strangely though, they never seem to acknowledge that our government's fundamental policy flaws never seem to change regardless of which party is in office.
Infantized Americans like to focus on the opposing rhetoric of the two parties, but never their actions.
If they did, they might finally understand that the Republicans and the Democrats at the highest levels have the exact same philosophies and goals, and therefore, the people have no real choice, and thus, we are NOT the government.
In the political tar pit we wallow in today, we do still at least have the ability through state and local governments to assert our sovereignty against federal imposition, but this is changing quickly.
In a global union, a world order centered on the eradication of sovereignty and the deconstruction of the Constitution, this ability will be rendered useless.
It is odd to me that infantized Americans cling to the false perception that our federal government is democratic while at the same time supporting increasingly unconstitutional and undemocratic centralization of authority.
It is as if they want to defer their responsibilities as citizens and be ruled, while still having the option of believing they are free to choose.
This has perhaps been the goal all along; a perfect tyranny in which the total feudalized control of economy and culture is applauded by the dim witted masses yearning for complete autonomy from their own fear of self-determination while being convinced that they are still participating in the decision making process.
Throw in some mandatory psychotropic medications and presto! You have a brave new world...
I've never quite understood our country's social addiction to naïve youth.
Its one thing to maintain a sense of awe and wonder with life, to always be willing to learn and grow beyond what we are, but there is a big difference between being "child-like, and "childish". Surrendering the great gift of destiny, individuality, the inherent and inborn freedom to find one's own path, just to prolong the cavalier and comparatively boring sheltered existence of our tender years, seems rather insane to me.
At bottom, infantized Americans are looking for only one freedom; freedom from the demands of life. The Global Elites are able to function in the significant capacity they do because they cater to this insanity.
But is anyone really crazy enough to believe that the global elites do this because they care about us?
Is it the love of a parental figure in the air that comforts the men-children of the world?
Or, is it the long hollow death of conscience and concern that has placed them in a hypnotic baby stupor?
MS70 Certified Silver & Gold American Eagle Coins-ShopNumis